Among the many expressions of confusion in the national press about his own role, given such a role moralizing or solidarity, "to highlight the sovereignty of their duty to inform. And nothing more palpable in this situation that any mention of Antarctica.
From Icarito up Weather Channel 13 . From the weather report The Third TVTiempo TVN to insist on calling that piece of ice located between 53 ° W and 90 ° W as the Chilean Antarctic Territory Chilean Antarctica and grant or certainly, part character the country. What is dramatic is that perseverance pays off and it seems that nobody in Chile is aware of the true forced. I've never heard anyone, under any circumstances even put quotes that fallacy: Chile has no territory in Antarctica and no other country possesses.
Any journalist reported should know, but the frozen continent is governed by Antarctic Treaty , signed on December 1, 1959 by thirteen countries, including ours, and in its Article 4 states a permanent freeze of any claim to sovereignty. Our Antarctica is not just a territorial claim not recognized by any other country, not least by the United Nations. It is also a very feeble claim that about 60% of the "Chilean Antarctic Territory is part of" Antarctica Argentina "and about 80% of the "British Antarctic Territory," of course countries that also have no sovereignty over any ice.
How long that the press must take as its own function "to sovereignty? Independent of the valid or not anything of "homeland defense", does the role does not correspond to other stakeholders? Is it so weak commitment of our press to freedom of opinion or information to any value that conflicts with it is willing to assign?
0 comments:
Post a Comment